A Private Equity Blog

A vignette into the aberrant thoughts of a private equiteer

Is venture capital a form of private equity and vice versa?

yingandyangA recent reader asked, why do I keep differentiating between private equity and venture capital, especially if venture capital is just a form of private equity. Well, in the strict sense, venture capital is private and it is often structured as equity, ergo, venture capital is private equity. (With that same definition, a $100 investment into a friend’s lemonade stall may also qualify as private equity.)

Image: Venture capital and private equity = ying and yang [source: Shutterstock]

However, when I refer to private equity, I’m referring to a business model of investment. A few characteristics of this strategy include the following:

  1. The business is privately owned, not traded on a public stock exchange
  2. The investor is active in the strategy and management of the business
  3. The investor is a professional investor employing a pool of funds over a portfolio of businesses
  4. The investment is mostly structured as equity, which gives the investor upside exposure
  5. The investment is in an established business with existing customers and positive maintainable cash flow

This definition differentiates private equity from family investments at points 2, 3 and 5. It also differentiates against venture capital at point 5. The implication of this point 5 is that while venture capital is often linked to research, commercialisation and monetisation, private equity is more closely linked to expansion, succession, buyouts and recaps.

More simply, to me, VC is about building a business, whereas PE is about expanding a business. The difference may sound subtle, but it completely changes the model in terms of risk versus reward (see more here).

twitter: @privateequiteer |

Posted in Firm & Fund

  • Alex: I was just talking about this the other day with a VC. They said while they mostly use pref stock, they don't use a coupon or any other tool to create interim cash flows. Main reason is obviously that they don't have the free cash and they've got uses for any spare cash, namely growth. So, yes, that certainly is one of the major differentiations.
  • Alex
    I think you see a big difference if you make point 4 a bit more precise. A VC will invest directly as ungeared equity, whereas PE will actually invest predominantly in quasi-equity (ie Loan Notes, Preference Shares) with a relatively high coupon, leaving the ordinary equity as a tiny sliver at the top of the capital structure (on Day 1- if all goes well it will grow).
  • Greg: where I'm from, PE and VC are quite distinct; hence, the way I refer to them, which has admittedly caused some confusion.

    Good point about needing revenue for funding these days, but private equiteers (unlike VCs), tend to scoff at using "revenue" and "value" in the same sentence. We even scoff at profit and value in the same sentence; we want maintainable free cash flow.

    Analyst: that's why I added the word maintainable. I suspect even in distressed situations, investors hope maintainable cash flow is positive even if current cash flow is negative. What's the difference you may ask? Well, I suppose that maintainable cash flow relates to what's expected of the ongoing operations. Anyway, that was my take at the time of writing, but it's a good point you make.
  • Analyst
    To add to the discussion, point 5 might be expanded to read "The investment is in an established business with existing customers and a core of positive maintainable cash flows"

    Reason being the highly popular distressed private equity industry...
  • Greg
    I think that while in the bubble days of '99-'00, point 5 didn't necessarily apply to venture capital backed firms, these days, it seems like for anybody who's looking to raise a Series A, one has to come to the table with positive revenue stream instead of just a fancy idea now..

    I do agree with your final point though and believe that it is a pretty major distinction. That said, don't people still generally consider VC a subset of PE?
blog comments powered by Disqus