<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s all about investing in the best management team&#8230; isn&#8217;t it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/its-all-about-investing-in-the-best-management-team-isnt-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/its-all-about-investing-in-the-best-management-team-isnt-it/</link>
	<description>A vignette into the aberrant thoughts of a private equiteer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:18:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyM @ leavingfinance.com</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/its-all-about-investing-in-the-best-management-team-isnt-it/comment-page-1/#comment-7088</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyM @ leavingfinance.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 06:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/?p=2051#comment-7088</guid>
		<description>Thanks - interesting post. As the Oracle of Omaha says: &lt;br&gt;&quot;When a management with a reputation for brilliance tackles a business with a poor reputation for fundamental economics, it is the reputation of the &lt;br&gt;business that stays intact.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8211; interesting post. As the Oracle of Omaha says: <br />&#8220;When a management with a reputation for brilliance tackles a business with a poor reputation for fundamental economics, it is the reputation of the <br />business that stays intact.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Private Equiteer</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/its-all-about-investing-in-the-best-management-team-isnt-it/comment-page-1/#comment-3643</link>
		<dc:creator>The Private Equiteer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/?p=2051#comment-3643</guid>
		<description>@Tony - the Oracle is possibly the ultimate equiteer and potentially one of a few whose strategy really is investing in the best management. Of course he now has the luxury of being revered by even the greatest managers. Interesting blog by the way; have added it to my reader and sent to a bankers.

@T.E.D - great points. And great blog too; not sure how I haven&#039;t come across it until now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tony &#8211; the Oracle is possibly the ultimate equiteer and potentially one of a few whose strategy really is investing in the best management. Of course he now has the luxury of being revered by even the greatest managers. Interesting blog by the way; have added it to my reader and sent to a bankers.</p>
<p>@T.E.D &#8211; great points. And great blog too; not sure how I haven&#8217;t come across it until now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Epicurean Dealmaker</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/its-all-about-investing-in-the-best-management-team-isnt-it/comment-page-1/#comment-3640</link>
		<dc:creator>The Epicurean Dealmaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/?p=2051#comment-3640</guid>
		<description>I tend to think there is a substantial portion of what the British like to call &quot;oil&quot; (or flattery) in the mix, too.  After all, as you point out, sponsors have to buy existing companies which normally have existing management.  Usually it is easier get existing management&#039;s cooperation in closing a transaction when they have bought the bullshit that you only partner with top-notch managers, among which, by implication, you appear to number them.  Only after they work for you do you have to determine whether they really measure up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to think there is a substantial portion of what the British like to call &#8220;oil&#8221; (or flattery) in the mix, too.  After all, as you point out, sponsors have to buy existing companies which normally have existing management.  Usually it is easier get existing management&#8217;s cooperation in closing a transaction when they have bought the bullshit that you only partner with top-notch managers, among which, by implication, you appear to number them.  Only after they work for you do you have to determine whether they really measure up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TonyM @ leavingfinance.com</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/its-all-about-investing-in-the-best-management-team-isnt-it/comment-page-1/#comment-3636</link>
		<dc:creator>TonyM @ leavingfinance.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/?p=2051#comment-3636</guid>
		<description>Thanks - interesting post. As the Oracle of Omaha says: 
&quot;When a management with a reputation for brilliance tackles a business with a poor reputation for fundamental economics, it is the reputation of the 
business that stays intact.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8211; interesting post. As the Oracle of Omaha says:<br />
&#8220;When a management with a reputation for brilliance tackles a business with a poor reputation for fundamental economics, it is the reputation of the<br />
business that stays intact.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
