<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should I consider EBITDA or EBIT?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/should-i-consider-ebitda-or-ebit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/should-i-consider-ebitda-or-ebit/</link>
	<description>A vignette into the aberrant thoughts of a private equiteer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:18:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to calculate capex from financial statements &#124; The Private Equiteer - A Private Equity Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/should-i-consider-ebitda-or-ebit/comment-page-1/#comment-3525</link>
		<dc:creator>How to calculate capex from financial statements &#124; The Private Equiteer - A Private Equity Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/?p=1845#comment-3525</guid>
		<description>[...] a proxy for capex and cite its smoothing effect as an additional advantage (I wrote about this in a recent post on EBITDA vs. EBIT). However, this smoothing, which accounts for many years, may reflect the business as a different [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a proxy for capex and cite its smoothing effect as an additional advantage (I wrote about this in a recent post on EBITDA vs. EBIT). However, this smoothing, which accounts for many years, may reflect the business as a different [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
