<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 2/20 rule for private equity funds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/the-220-rule-for-private-equity-funds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/the-220-rule-for-private-equity-funds/</link>
	<description>A vignette into the aberrant thoughts of a private equiteer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 13:18:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carried Interest 2.0 &#124; A Private Equity Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/the-220-rule-for-private-equity-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-7221</link>
		<dc:creator>Carried Interest 2.0 &#124; A Private Equity Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 01:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateequiteer.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-7221</guid>
		<description>[...] business and they&#8217;re unlikely to change course at the behest of the LPs who agreed to the 2/20 terms in the first place. It would go against the grain of the private equity methodology to take on a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] business and they&#8217;re unlikely to change course at the behest of the LPs who agreed to the 2/20 terms in the first place. It would go against the grain of the private equity methodology to take on a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recap on textbook private equity posts &#124; A Private Equity Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/the-220-rule-for-private-equity-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-7173</link>
		<dc:creator>Recap on textbook private equity posts &#124; A Private Equity Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateequiteer.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-7173</guid>
		<description>[...] The 2/20 rule for private equity funds [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The 2/20 rule for private equity funds [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the Private Equiteer</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/the-220-rule-for-private-equity-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-7072</link>
		<dc:creator>the Private Equiteer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 06:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateequiteer.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-7072</guid>
		<description>FT published an article asking if it was the end of the 2/20 rule. Upon further investigation I found they were referring to hedge funds. I honestly believe, as per my post, that the 2/20 rule is the lifeblood of the private equity industry. Consequently, I can&#039;t see PE working without it. Of course operations would still continue, but the without the best people, it just would be what it is today, in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FT published an article asking if it was the end of the 2/20 rule. Upon further investigation I found they were referring to hedge funds. I honestly believe, as per my post, that the 2/20 rule is the lifeblood of the private equity industry. Consequently, I can&#39;t see PE working without it. Of course operations would still continue, but the without the best people, it just would be what it is today, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DevelopmentCorporate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What the Proposed Carried Interest Tax Means for Private Equity Portfolio Companies</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/the-220-rule-for-private-equity-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-7002</link>
		<dc:creator>DevelopmentCorporate &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What the Proposed Carried Interest Tax Means for Private Equity Portfolio Companies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 07:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateequiteer.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-7002</guid>
		<description>[...] and then claim 20% of the profits (aka carried interest) when the investment is sold (the infamous 2 and 20 rule).  Historically, carried interest has been taxed as a capital gain in the United States since the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and then claim 20% of the profits (aka carried interest) when the investment is sold (the infamous 2 and 20 rule).  Historically, carried interest has been taxed as a capital gain in the United States since the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Private Equiteer</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/the-220-rule-for-private-equity-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-4864</link>
		<dc:creator>The Private Equiteer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateequiteer.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-4864</guid>
		<description>Hey Vinay. Yes, fees are calculated on the entire $1b. But if you sell one your investees and return the capital + profits to investors, then fees are not calculated on that amount. So, let&#039;s say you used $200m for that investment you just exited, then fees only apply to $800m.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Vinay. Yes, fees are calculated on the entire $1b. But if you sell one your investees and return the capital + profits to investors, then fees are not calculated on that amount. So, let&#8217;s say you used $200m for that investment you just exited, then fees only apply to $800m.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinay</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/the-220-rule-for-private-equity-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-4863</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateequiteer.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-4863</guid>
		<description>When you say &quot;only invested or uncalled capital attracts fees&quot;, what exactly does that mean? Say $1bn fund with $400mn already invested and $600mn of fire power still there. Will the fees be calculated on $1bn or $600mn?

Regards,
Vinay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you say &#8220;only invested or uncalled capital attracts fees&#8221;, what exactly does that mean? Say $1bn fund with $400mn already invested and $600mn of fire power still there. Will the fees be calculated on $1bn or $600mn?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Vinay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capital calls: who&#8217;s really in control? &#124; The Private Equiteer</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/the-220-rule-for-private-equity-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>Capital calls: who&#8217;s really in control? &#124; The Private Equiteer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateequiteer.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-81</guid>
		<description>[...] what they&#8217;re always concerned about&#8230; the carry.  I&#8217;ve written about the 2/20 rule and the significance of carry [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] what they&#8217;re always concerned about&#8230; the carry.  I&#8217;ve written about the 2/20 rule and the significance of carry [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bred in capitivity&#8230; and looking to escape &#124; The Private Equiteer</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/the-220-rule-for-private-equity-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Bred in capitivity&#8230; and looking to escape &#124; The Private Equiteer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateequiteer.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-70</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve written previously about how private equity teams are precious about their carry and how various external parties can have a stake in the carry. Well, it&#8217;s not unusual for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve written previously about how private equity teams are precious about their carry and how various external parties can have a stake in the carry. Well, it&#8217;s not unusual for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Show me the carry&#8230; or at least most of it &#124; The Private Equiteer</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/the-220-rule-for-private-equity-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Show me the carry&#8230; or at least most of it &#124; The Private Equiteer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 08:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateequiteer.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-68</guid>
		<description>[...] a previous post I talked about the fee structure of the typical private equity fund and in particular the 20% [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a previous post I talked about the fee structure of the typical private equity fund and in particular the 20% [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Structure of a private equity fund &#124; The Private Equiteer</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/the-220-rule-for-private-equity-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Structure of a private equity fund &#124; The Private Equiteer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 07:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateequiteer.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-64</guid>
		<description>[...] refer to a direct investment of the fund, but it mostly refers to the right to carried interest. This article talks about &#8220;carry&#8221; in more detail. The partnership deed outlines the terms such as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] refer to a direct investment of the fund, but it mostly refers to the right to carried interest. This article talks about &#8220;carry&#8221; in more detail. The partnership deed outlines the terms such as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bred in capitivity… and looking to escape at Mea Sententia</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/the-220-rule-for-private-equity-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Bred in capitivity… and looking to escape at Mea Sententia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateequiteer.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-55</guid>
		<description>[...] I’ve written previously about how private equity teams are precious about their carry and how various external parties can have a stake in the carry. Well, it’s not unusual for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I’ve written previously about how private equity teams are precious about their carry and how various external parties can have a stake in the carry. Well, it’s not unusual for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Show me the carry… or at least most of it at Mea Sententia</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/the-220-rule-for-private-equity-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Show me the carry… or at least most of it at Mea Sententia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateequiteer.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-51</guid>
		<description>[...] a previous post I talked about the fee structure of the typical private equity fund and in particular the 20% [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a previous post I talked about the fee structure of the typical private equity fund and in particular the 20% [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Structure of a private equity fund at Mea Sententia</title>
		<link>http://www.theprivateequiteer.com/the-220-rule-for-private-equity-funds/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Structure of a private equity fund at Mea Sententia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theprivateequiteer.wordpress.com/?p=111#comment-49</guid>
		<description>[...] refer to a direct investment of the fund, but it mostly refers to the right to carried interest. This article talks about “carry” in more detail. The partnership deed outlines the terms such as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] refer to a direct investment of the fund, but it mostly refers to the right to carried interest. This article talks about “carry” in more detail. The partnership deed outlines the terms such as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
